Hello Guest, if you are reading this it means you have not registered yet. Please take a second, Click here to register, and in a few simple steps you will be able to enjoy our community and use our OpenViX support section.
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Vu+ Duo2 and blindscan

  1. #1
    eastof111

    Vu+ Duo2 and blindscan

    I am contemplating getting a Duo2 with two tuners. Has anyone experimented with blind scan yet? Looking for real life reviews.

    2- Does the blind scan work on one or both tuners?
    3- Anyone have blind scanning times for both C and Ku vs. non-blind scanning?
    4- Do scanning times differ between images utilized?

    Thank you and appreciate your input.

  2. #2
    Rob van der Does's Avatar
    Title
    ViX Beta Tester
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands & France
    Posts
    36,262
    Thanks
    1,720
    Thanked 9,461 Times in 6,675 Posts
    ad 2: On both. However: the dual tuners still don't support blindscan (VU+ is working an a driver update for that)

    ad 3: Not sure what you're after; scanning transponders that are present in your satellites.xml has hardly anything to do with blindscan. And any comparison you would do depends on the satellites.xml in use.
    I have no experience on C-band scanning, but Ku-band blindscan works fine.

    ad 4: Probably not, as the same hardware and drivers are being used. What does differ between images is the user friendlyness of the plugin. In ViX a lot of effort has been spend on the latter.

    Help asked via PM will be ignored.
    The forum is there for help and all will benefit from your questions.
    NO CARD SHARING TALK WILL BE TOLERATED, LAN OR WAN, IN OPEN FORUM OR PM !

    English is not my native tongue.
    I apologise for all my grammar, spelling and idiom errors.

  3. #3
    eastof111
    Thank you very much for your input. In regards to ad 3, I am trying to get an approximate hardware vs. software scan speed as compared to other receivers that I am using. I realize that scan speeds will vary between sats scanned, but it would give me a ball park figure that I can use to evaluate.

  4. #4
    Rob van der Does's Avatar
    Title
    ViX Beta Tester
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands & France
    Posts
    36,262
    Thanks
    1,720
    Thanked 9,461 Times in 6,675 Posts
    The blindscan of 19.2E took 2 mins 10 sec; result attached (104 transponders found).
    Attached Files Attached Files

    Help asked via PM will be ignored.
    The forum is there for help and all will benefit from your questions.
    NO CARD SHARING TALK WILL BE TOLERATED, LAN OR WAN, IN OPEN FORUM OR PM !

    English is not my native tongue.
    I apologise for all my grammar, spelling and idiom errors.

  5. #5

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    238
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts
    Are the tuners hardware blindscan?

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4

  6. #6
    Rob van der Does's Avatar
    Title
    ViX Beta Tester
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands & France
    Posts
    36,262
    Thanks
    1,720
    Thanked 9,461 Times in 6,675 Posts
    Yes.

    The dual-tuner cards still need a (promised) driver update for that.

    Help asked via PM will be ignored.
    The forum is there for help and all will benefit from your questions.
    NO CARD SHARING TALK WILL BE TOLERATED, LAN OR WAN, IN OPEN FORUM OR PM !

    English is not my native tongue.
    I apologise for all my grammar, spelling and idiom errors.

  7. #7
    eastof111
    Thanks for the xml file. Didn't know that it still needs drivers for hardware blind scan support. After reading some of the reviews, I was left with the impression that the blind scans performed were hardware related.

    Thanks again.

  8. #8
    Rob van der Does's Avatar
    Title
    ViX Beta Tester
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands & France
    Posts
    36,262
    Thanks
    1,720
    Thanked 9,461 Times in 6,675 Posts
    All functionality of hardware, not one single item excluded, is called via drivers; how else could one 'talk' to hardware?

    Also drivers have to support all functionality. A simple example: the chipset of all VU-boxes supports the WMV-codec. But as the drivers have no support for that (i.e. the codec is not enabled) it is the same as if that codec was not in the hardware at all.


    Also note that the user-friendly plugin and the resulting xml are specific for OE-alliance images.
    Last edited by Rob van der Does; 20-08-13 at 05:28.

    Help asked via PM will be ignored.
    The forum is there for help and all will benefit from your questions.
    NO CARD SHARING TALK WILL BE TOLERATED, LAN OR WAN, IN OPEN FORUM OR PM !

    English is not my native tongue.
    I apologise for all my grammar, spelling and idiom errors.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.