Blindscan

[girginoz]

With new driver on latest image 692 blindscan seems working but does not find most of existing transponders.
I blinscanned Hellassat which was unscanned before to find only 9 channels.

[girginoz]

When i rescanned with 693 this time 110 channels found. Probably i am wrong or these open source receivers are not as accurate as ordinary closed source ones

[Sicilian]

I'm pretty sure the HD800xx is not blindscan capable, are you sure you've posted this in the correct section?

[girginoz]

I'm pretty sure the HD800xx is not blindscan capable, are you sure you've posted this in the correct section?

No, i am not so sure But it has nothing to do with openvix images. Its the same with all others.
But yes, there is a blindscan option with odd results.

[Sicilian]

No, i am not so sure But it has nothing to do with openvix images. Its the same with all others.
But yes, there is a blindscan option with odd results.

Well what receiver are you using exactly?

[girginoz]

Same in my signature: Gigablue 800 se

[pooface]

Same in my signature: Gigablue 800 se

And as Sic said, not sure 800 is blind scan compatible... So maybe why you're not getting results you'd want... With any image

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

[girginoz]

And as Sic said, not sure 800 is blind scan compatible... So maybe why you're not getting results you'd want... With any image

Will have to renew satellites xml frequently More pc dependancy.
Almost 60 satellites within range and it would be easier to blindscan once in a while.
Furthermore, 28.2 and 28.5 degrees with weak signal need to be separated in xml for exact focusing...
Thanks, anyway

[girginoz]

It is an "either radio or blindscan" case
(Returned to openvix 685 with old driver: Radios gone, blinscan came)
I would rather have both but blindscan is my first choice.

[girginoz]

Somehow it is working with openvix 695 image: Found a tp missing in satellites xml

[Rob van der Does]

Somehow it is working with openvix 695 image: Found a tp missing in satellites xml

But that is not related to blindscan

[girginoz]

But that is not related to blindscan

? I always overwrite my own xml after loading new image and backup.
(Sorry, my xml considered invalid file to be uploaded here)
But yes, you are right That tp not in xml but in lamedb file.

[Rob van der Does]

Not sure if we're talking about the same.
1- Blindscan doesn't use any existing transponders (hence the name);
2- A normal scan is carried out using the transponders in the satellite.xml;
3- Tuning to a channel is done on transponfers in the lamedb;
4- The satellites.xml in etc/tuxbox is a systemfile and is being maintained by the image(updates). The satelite.xml you afe uploading yourself (and the sysyem is using) is in etc/enigma2

[girginoz]

Not sure if we're talking about the same.
1- Blindscan doesn't use any existing transponders (hence the name);
2- A normal scan is carried out using the transponders in the satellite.xml;
3- Tuning to a channel is done on transponfers in the lamedb;
4- The satellites.xml in etc/tuxbox is a systemfile and is being maintained by the image(updates). The satelite.xml you afe uploading yourself (and the sysyem is using) is in etc/enigma2

I overwrite my own xml in etc/tuxbox. Do you mean i should overwrite the one in etc/enigma2?
But there is no such file there

[girginoz]

There are satellites.xml's other than one in etc/tuxbox:
/etc 26 bytes
/usr/share 26bytes
/usr/share/tuxbox 26 bytes
What i am talking about is around 480 KB.
It takes us back to my message #10