Hello Guest, if you are reading this it means you have not registered yet. Please take a second, Click here to register, and in a few simple steps you will be able to enjoy our community and use our OpenViX support section.
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: My thoughts in Vu+ Solo2 compared to Clarke Tech E9000

  1. #1

    Title
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 16 Times in 8 Posts

    My thoughts in Vu+ Solo2 compared to Clarke Tech E9000

    As I have been running the ClarkeTech for now over a year I have been mostly happy with the box, specially since I found the VXI Image here on this board. It wasn't the fastest box in the world but VXI team made it a fairly good box that worked very close to what a "normal" satellite receiver does.

    One of the biggest problem with the ClarkeTech box is that you can not record HDTV channels on tuner 2 if they are broadcasted in 1080i, it would be absolutely rubbish on the recording. This, I can understand from forums like this, has been fixed in newer revisions of the box.

    The Solo2 is an absolutely great box in so many ways. It is truly blistering fast and when the kernel can finally utilize the dual core CPU I think there can be done a lot of really incredible things on this box. It has good support for 1080p, which very nice as we properly all has support for this on our television sets.

    There are thought some issues still on the box that we can just hope that VU+ fixes quickly with driver updates (as I can understand from the VXI posts) so that you can not view a recording at the same time as you a making the recording which is a bit annoying.

    The remote control is another matter. I are going to miss the remote from the ClarkeTech which I think is so much better than the remote from Vu+. The VU+ remote has the same missing buttons as the Dreambox remote has, the ClarkeTech remote is much more complete in that regard. The layout of the remote is also much better on the ClarkeTech than on the Vu+ remote which make it simpler to navigate the ClarkeTech than the Vu+ Solo2. Can we hope for a better remote in the future?

    Quick note about the images Black Hole and VXI.
    As VXI wasn't available when I bought my box, I installed the Black Hole image on my new Solo2. It seems like a good image in many ways, but they are making things a bit hard to use at times. The EPG has a strange layout I do not like at all, and I haven't been able to find a way to change the default behavior. The Blue button takes you in to a Cam manager but their different solutions are a bit hard to understand, in my opinion.

    The VXI image is more complete from the start with use of the remote a bit better. The EPG button takes you in to a multiple view of EPG of all the channels as I would expect, there are more settings to be done like automatic time shift etc. I do miss the build in clock in the default skin in the info bar on Black hole and the Media player that starts when looking at DNLA servers, but that can be fixed with new skin and plug ins.

    If anyone is looking into buying a good two tuner box, then I would definitely recommend the VU+ Solo2 especially if you are going to install the VXI image. If the the track record of the VXI team is something to count on, and I think it is, then this combination is going to be outstanding.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to drzaphod For This Useful Post:

    bassethound (30-12-12),Donnie (30-12-12),dudo2 (20-01-13),Godanapo (31-12-12),irishchris (30-12-12),s31teg (30-12-12),Watsoccurring (31-12-12)

  3. #2
    digidude
    and when the kernel can finally utilize the dual core CPU
    Doesnt it use the full processing power available then?

  4. #3

    Title
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 16 Times in 8 Posts
    As far as I have understood when reading on the net, it doesn't yet. This has to do with the kernel in Linux that does not have drivers yet for the full utilization of the processor. But I could be wrong here, so if someone know more please tell.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to drzaphod For This Useful Post:


  6. #4

    Title
    Forum Supporter
    Donated Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    301
    Thanks
    81
    Thanked 40 Times in 32 Posts
    Interesting about the drivers if it's true. It's rapid as it is.

  7. #5

    Title
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 16 Times in 8 Posts
    It should be as this processor should give a lot more speed than just triple. (400 MHz compared to 1,3GHz). This is a dual core processor on the latest technologies it should offer a lot of capabilities in the future for all kinds of nice stuff in the image.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.