What do you think of PLI 30-08-2010 Image?

[reddishd]

Here is where you can discuss issues for UR image 30-08-2010.

[reddishd]

Is this Image worth putting on my TM 800hd yet, I am still using 5/06/2010 as this is a stable image for CCcam. Any thoughts?

[basilyoung]

@ the moment, I would stick with what works, unless you fancy messing around with the unit, or have a reason to try something else, I do not own the TM800, so my comments are general advice

baz

[fdlsys]

Is this Image worth putting on my TM 800hd yet, I am still using 5/06/2010 as this is a stable image for CCcam. Any thoughts?

Are you saying that cccam was not stable under later images? I would think exactly the opposite, to be honest. I installed the 15/07 the moment it came out because previous ones were green-screening or locking up all the time.
Now I have the 28/8 and even though they added a few niggly irrelevant bits and bobs, some of the previous functionality got buggered and to me zapping and decoding the channel seems significantly slower than before. Could be due to my flash being 89% full, who knows...
About to go up to 30/8, I'll let you know.

But 15/7 was top class with cccam - you can trust me on this.

(Hey Baz!)

[basilyoung]

hi fidlsys

[fdlsys]

OK, 30/8 installed, I do not see any differences from 28/8 - but I'm still rescanning the channels, so, maybe...
Must say, little bit of zapping I tried, seems faster now. We'll see when everything is in place, jumping LNBs vis Diseqc switch, zapping back and forth, etc.
Later...

[reddishd]

That i am. Nothing but trouble with this got dam box. Not stable at all with CCcam 2.1.4
The best image i have found is the 15-07-2010 so far that has been left for 2 weeks without touching the box except for phone line updates that image is pretty impressive for the technomate but the latest image has not even mannaged a day and CCcam is shut down as soon as you start trying to change from HD sport channel to a normal one.
I must be doing somthing wrong if nobody else is having trouble with stability on 24/7.

[bassethound]

Had my TM800 since first day of release its the worst supported box i currently own after 3 months on sale there is still no stable image that do all the things they advertise it will do.

You just get betas and test images most of these are step backwards.

[fdlsys]

You first said that you were still on 5/6/2010, now you say 15/7/2010? Stop trolling!
But you're right - for me too, 15/7 was solid and fast. I've tried all 3 (or, one with diff. compile dates, hmm?) of the latest ones, 26, 28 and 30/08 and I'm not having much luck with zap speed. CCcam works though - no lockups, so you must be having something unique
Anyway... I'm going back to 15/7. Shiny VFD doesn't do anything for me.

[reddishd]

Yep I am sticking with 15/7, sorry for any confusion with image dates!
The less lights on the front the less my 1year old wants to play with the front of it. He he!

[kevbroughton]

seems good, however is it just me or are others finding it hard to exit when deep into menus?

the exit button does not seem to work when in setup.

[fdlsys]

It does, but the overall responsiveness of the software (not just the RCU) has taken a serious knock with the last betas (26-28-30). Everything is sluggish as heck. Zapping, emulator/decoding, ...

[eazi]

Not sure if this is relevant but when I got my box I put the latest image straight on (28-08 at the time). It has been very stable and quick Zapping.

[fdlsys]

Phew. Who knows. Both the upgrade and factory reset processes are a bit of a mystery to me. Neither seems to clean up everything that I would expect it to.

[reddishd]

At last, I am now on the latest image.
STILL NO CARD READER (Smargo+ is my only way to do what i want).
This image (last september) is much more stable and the box is running at about 70%c with HDD installed and my own fan on main cpu.
Where is this latest image with card reader stuff????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????.............