Ref. my original Post "Poor picture quality vix 4.2" on XTrend 10k. Being an Electronics Engineer, I can relate to some of the comments made, but can categorically state, that with no video enhancements ever been installed and the Receiver has only ever had out-of-the-box bare images installed, that 3.2 is better on that receiver than 4.2. I have re-installed both images 3 times to be sure. As to the comment of my attitude towards Updates, IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT, in my case, I have no problems with 3.2, it provides me with all the functions I need and therefore, it makes no sense to change that. I do however appreciate the work the Vix Team does and in no way, was my Post a complaint to them, just an observation.