Hello Guest, if you are reading this it means you have not registered yet. Please take a second, Click here to register, and in a few simple steps you will be able to enjoy our community and use our OpenViX support section.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: The Royal Titties

  1. #1

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    274
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts

    The Royal Titties

    So whats the big problem with the all the news channels censoring these pictures of those royal titties I ask myself. Can it be the UK is so old fashioned that nipples are blured out from these photos so that the general public can't choose wether or not they should look at'em?
    If it was any other womans nipples - no problem - no one would think anything of it. So enough of the candidness lads, here's the unedited pics - wadya think?

  2. #2
    Larry-G's Avatar
    Title
    V.I.P
    Donated Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    32,542
    Thanks
    7,824
    Thanked 22,937 Times in 12,378 Posts
    dont go uploading those photos here unless you feel like covering the legal bill for it.

    as to the point of the thread as far as i am concerned it's a clear cut case of voyeurism and the trash that took the photos should be locked up for it.
    My posts contain my own personal thoughts and opinions, they do not represent those of any organisation or group but my own.

    If you don't like what I post, Don't read it.

    SIMPLES.

  3. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Larry-G For This Useful Post:

    bassethound (17-09-12),Conaxthewarrior (18-09-12),irishchris (19-09-12),Mr. Mister (18-09-12),Sicilian (17-09-12)

  4. #3
    pooface's Avatar
    Title
    V.I.P
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    9,731
    Thanks
    1,904
    Thanked 4,791 Times in 1,951 Posts
    As Phoenix says, please do not upload the photos here. Anyone who wants to see them will Google and find out in a flash...

    As for the legal case they're making, then I think they should stop moaning. They are in the public lime light after all... They should not even risk being if they don't want to risk the photos being taken...

    Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using Tapatalk 2
    Rules can be found HERE
    Support our sponsor, World-Of-Satellite HERE
    Follow us on Twitter HERE
    -----
    Vu+ Ultimo (ViX Beta), Vu+ Solo (ViX Beta), CT ET9000 (ViX Beta)
    Dark Motor Superior with Inverto Ultra Black Twin LNB
    85cm Gibertini Aluminium Dish

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pooface For This Useful Post:

    Conaxthewarrior (18-09-12),Sicilian (17-09-12)

  6. #4
    Rob van der Does's Avatar
    Title
    ViX Beta Tester
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands & France
    Posts
    36,270
    Thanks
    1,720
    Thanked 9,461 Times in 6,675 Posts
    Indeed: 'voyeurism ' is the sole and only word that springs to my mind in this whole affair.
    And their are plenty sites fulfilling one's 'need' for that

    Help asked via PM will be ignored.
    The forum is there for help and all will benefit from your questions.
    NO CARD SHARING TALK WILL BE TOLERATED, LAN OR WAN, IN OPEN FORUM OR PM !

    English is not my native tongue.
    I apologise for all my grammar, spelling and idiom errors.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Rob van der Does For This Useful Post:

    Sicilian (17-09-12)

  8. #5

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    274
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
    Fair reply gents. My intent was aimed at criticism of cencorship for the masses (which i belive theres too much of in the Uk) and not to generally offend.

  9. #6
    Larry-G's Avatar
    Title
    V.I.P
    Donated Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    32,542
    Thanks
    7,824
    Thanked 22,937 Times in 12,378 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Conaxthewarrior View Post
    Fair reply gents. My intent was aimed at criticism of cencorship for the masses (which i belive theres too much of in the Uk) and not to generally offend.
    I know your intentions were for the good, but we have to consider the legal ramifications that could befall us if we were to host such photos on this site.
    My posts contain my own personal thoughts and opinions, they do not represent those of any organisation or group but my own.

    If you don't like what I post, Don't read it.

    SIMPLES.

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Larry-G For This Useful Post:

    bassethound (17-09-12),Conaxthewarrior (18-09-12),Mr. Mister (18-09-12),Sicilian (17-09-12)

  11. #7
    basilyoung's Avatar
    Title
    V.I.P - R.I.P - Will never be forgotten...
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,233
    Thanks
    423
    Thanked 1,075 Times in 810 Posts
    yep, cencorship is rife in this country, and the rich and famous can hide behind it, but your example, was a bit wide of the mark, if that was your daughter/wife being photo,d with out there knowledge, and being sold on to a porn mag or paper, or better still if you had caught him, I think you would batter the bar steward
    Units; VU+Ultimo/duo/DM800/7020HD/tm9100
    1.2 channel master/quad feedhorn/36volt /vbox
    1 fixed dish, and 1 motorized 1mtr dish
    and a pile of redundant cards/cams

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to basilyoung For This Useful Post:

    Mr. Mister (18-09-12)

  13. #8

    Title
    ViX Beta Tester
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    14,099
    Thanks
    3,389
    Thanked 4,102 Times in 3,198 Posts
    I'm far from a royalist, but scum who hide in bushes taking long range shots of anybody in a private setting to earn £££ need to be stopped. This ****er should be fined or jailed for voyeurism.

  14. #9

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    274
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by basilyoung View Post
    yep, cencorship is rife in this country, and the rich and famous can hide behind it, but your example, was a bit wide of the mark, if that was your daughter/wife being photo,d with out there knowledge, and being sold on to a porn mag or paper, or better still if you had caught him, I think you would batter the bar steward
    I simply took a current news affair as an example intending to emphasize the widely accepted inbalance of what is called the freedom of the press on the one hand, while news censorship of the mass population is also "acceptable"on the other.
    These were not photos threatening national security, everyone could understand if such photos were censored and I agree the photos were taken without the permission of those concerned but it has to be asked what right has a society got that prides itself in being the home of democracy yet allows such widespread censorship?
    Another example, also by chance royal, was the recent Prince Harry's naked swimming video - shown on national tv blured out in part...the list goes on.
    Lastly, I expect if it was my son or daughter someone candidly took photos of , any published photos most certainly wouldnt be cencored , but then again there wouldnt be as great an interest as there is when royalty is involved. Taking such photos without the permission of the concered is illegal in the uk but if everyone can access them on the internet anyhow, then where are we and what is required to counteract all this? More censorship and surveilance of the internet perhaps? Back to square one.

  15. #10

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    274
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pheonix View Post
    I know your intentions were for the good, but we have to consider the legal ramifications that could befall us if we were to host such photos on this site.
    Ok I shouldnt have posted the photos , just my way of getting "directly" to the point. Respects to the forum guys, you all do a good job here.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Conaxthewarrior For This Useful Post:

    irishchris (19-09-12),Maxwell (20-09-12)

  17. #11

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    274
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
    As it happens, the Danish tabloid Se og Hør (See and Hear) has today published the photos of these royal titties and , as I live in this country, I bought a copy to see how the paper went about its uncencored publication of them, in contrast to the massive editing seen in the UK.
    The editor wrote (my translation)
    "Our readers like to follow the lives of both the Danish and Uk's royals in every detail. I'm therefore proud that Se og Hør has aquired the rights to publish photos of Great Britians future queen topless.
    The whole world is presently talking about these photos while only a few of the population has actually seen them.
    Se og hør has always seeked to entertain and satisfy our readers curiosity and so it is very relevant to us when the future queen of England goes topless and freely shows her breasts towards a public highway. These photos have been published in Sweden, Finland,Holland,Belgium, Germany, Italy and some other countries." Cheif editor Kim Henningsen.
    So theres an example of freedom of the press and open cencorship if ever there was.
    The photos came in an extra section titled "The forbidden photos" , using the uk's cencoring & cover up as an attractor. Thirty pictures in all, about ½ showing naughty bits - the rest, just uninteresting everyday boring family holiday snaps.
    A further thought, if the photos have already been published in all these countries listed earlier, what good does it do obtaining a ban in france alone? Seems like the classic closing of the barn doors after the horse has bolted.

  18. #12
    Mr. Mister's Avatar
    Title
    Moderator
    Donated Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    4,936
    Thanks
    4,825
    Thanked 2,677 Times in 1,190 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Conaxthewarrior View Post
    The editor wrote (my translation)
    "Our readers like to follow the lives of both the Danish and Uk's royals in every detail. I'm therefore proud that Se og Hør has aquired the rights to publish photos of Great Britians future queen topless.
    The whole world is presently talking about these photos while only a few of the population has actually seen them.
    Se og hør has always seeked to entertain and satisfy our readers curiosity and so it is very relevant to us when the future queen of England goes topless and freely shows her breasts towards a public highway. These photos have been published in Sweden, Finland,Holland,Belgium, Germany, Italy and some other countries." Cheif editor Kim Henningsen.
    So theres an example of freedom of the press and open cencorship if ever there was.
    The photos came in an extra section titled "The forbidden photos" , using the uk's cencoring & cover up as an attractor. Thirty pictures in all, about ½ showing naughty bits - the rest, just uninteresting everyday boring family holiday snaps.
    A further thought, if the photos have already been published in all these countries listed earlier, what good does it do obtaining a ban in france alone? Seems like the classic closing of the barn doors after the horse has bolted.
    Not strictly the case.. Is it.. ??

    I aint seen the photos.. Nor do i have any real desire to.. But as far as i am aware.. She was in what was supposed to be a private area.. With the photographer using one of his fancy lenses from 100`s of yards away..

    Something wrong somewhere along the line.. as the girl wants to sunbath topless.. ( In private with her husband ) and finds thats she is in the papers all over the world a few days after.. Scum photographers..

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mr. Mister For This Useful Post:

    basilyoung (20-09-12),Conaxthewarrior (20-09-12)

  20. #13
    basilyoung's Avatar
    Title
    V.I.P - R.I.P - Will never be forgotten...
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,233
    Thanks
    423
    Thanked 1,075 Times in 810 Posts
    my views are simple, and unchanged

    scum bags taking univited photo,s in a private situ, nothing to do with cencorship, and claiming copyright?? yes its all over the net, but it does,nt make it right, as for "no interest" in non hi profile peeps goes, like for example your wife/daughter perhaps, that might be true, in your opinion, but I wonder what they would think

    in the end, the person that took the photos, is guilty of voyourism, and needs sorting big time

    the only weak defence of these actions is, it could have been a gun, so the big question is, where was the security??
    Units; VU+Ultimo/duo/DM800/7020HD/tm9100
    1.2 channel master/quad feedhorn/36volt /vbox
    1 fixed dish, and 1 motorized 1mtr dish
    and a pile of redundant cards/cams

  21. #14

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    274
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
    Ok I must agree. the photos were cheepo and really a lot to do about nothing. Focusing soley on the "naughty" aspect (avoiding the censorship theme), these pics look like somthing from the Benny Hill show and with so much porn freely available on the net thesedays, people who want to "satisfy" themselves should go there instead. Admittidly, its a pity for the couple their hols were runined this way but it'ss true that where theres royaliy about, the paparazzi will surley follow.
    Ps Just thrown the mag out.

  22. #15

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by judge View Post
    I'm far from a royalist, but scum who hide in bushes taking long range shots of anybody in a private setting to earn £££ need to be stopped. This ****er should be fined or jailed for voyeurism.
    I guess I am a royalist but whether I am or not is not the point, these scum hide in bushes and take pictures for one reason only, to make profit at the expense of others. They respect no one and resort to underhand methods to compromise people. Lock them up and throw the key away. This has nothing to do with freedom of the press!!
    [COLOR="#FF0000"]Vu+ Ultimo - 1.1m Techomate 2600 motorised dish & a fixed Sky dish - 3.9.6 Kernal - Drivers 24/11/2015 - Image Was openvix-5.0.020 - CCCam 2.3 - 1TB Hard drive - Connected to Network using ethernet cable - Skin Vix-Night HD

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.