Duo-2 announced at Anga.

[Larry-G]

I would have thought they are going to replace them, otherwise they would have given them new names ?

very likely yes, just got to wait and see really, although would that also mean a end to their support in a software / driver sense for those models ?.

[Larry-G]

There is something wrong with the images pheonix posted.
Remove

http://1.2.3.11/bmi/

from the image URLs & they work fine.
Nice looking boxes... but puts me off another SAT box till they're released...

lol thats certainly strange as i have always posted images in that format and every single one has always showed fine for me.

[Ev0]

very likely yes, just got to wait and see really, although would that also mean a end to their support in a software / driver sense for those models ?.

It's all just guessing at the moment, afaik there still isn't an offical release date for the new box's, and I doubt they will be on the market much before xmas (going by the ultimo release last year).

If they stop manufacturing the current solo and duo, it doesn't mean support needs to stop imo, as if they stop producing the old models, who is going to buy "new" versions of the old models a month or 2 after they have sold out ?

That in a roundabout sort of way, "should" kill off the current clone market imo.

[judge]

lol thats certainly strange as i have always posted images in that format and every single one has always showed fine for me.

http://1.2.3.11 works for you? strange network my friend...

[basilyoung]

@ EVO,

read your comment about not using firefox, "giving away my secrets" can you explain a bit more please

[Ev0]

http://1.2.3.11 works for you? strange network my friend...

That will be good old firefox I guess lol

[Larry-G]

http://1.2.3.11 works for you? strange network my friend...

yes mate it's always worked for me in that format and has for several years.

[Ev0]

@ EVO,

read your comment about not using firefox, "giving away my secrets" can you explain a bit more please

I said i'm not a fan of firefox (meaning I don't like using it, as it just doesn't work how I want it to).

The comment about giving out all my secrets was about chrome and google's new policy to collect all your personal data.

[Larry-G]

@ EVO,

read your comment about not using firefox, "giving away my secrets" can you explain a bit more please

google "googles new privacy policy"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17205754

although to be fair if you think your somehow safe by using IE think again.

[Ev0]

google "googles new privacy policy"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17205754

although to be fair if you think your somehow safe by using IE think again.

I don't think your 100% safe with anything on the internet to be honest.

[basilyoung]

just off for a read....nosey barst^rds

[judge]

yes mate it's always worked for me in that format and has for several years.

First time your images haven't displayed for me.

http://1.2.3.11

Must be some kind of local/proxy network?
Removing that bit from the Image URLs does display them.

[Larry-G]

http://1.2.3.11 works for you? strange network my friend...

That will be good old firefox I guess lol

Those links including the ones in post 4 show perfectly fine for me on every browser i use on this laptop with, FF13, IE9, chrome, and safari. they also show fine on my ipad2 as well so no idea why you lot cant see them.

[xarqi]

Looks interesting. Blind scan support and mention of codec support for MKV, AVI, *etc*. 1080p24 output. Built-in WiFi allowing *HD* streaming. No fan.

[Sicilian]

Those links including the ones in post 4 show perfectly fine for me on every browser i use on this laptop with, FF13, IE9, chrome, and safari. they also show fine on my ipad2 as well so no idea why you lot cant see them.

Not showing for me also, FF or IE.