Hello Guest, if you are reading this it means you have not registered yet. Please take a second, Click here to register, and in a few simple steps you will be able to enjoy our community and use our OpenViX support section.
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The UK wants to essentially ban all secure communications

  1. #1
    Larry-G's Avatar
    Title
    V.I.P
    Donated Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    32,542
    Thanks
    7,824
    Thanked 22,934 Times in 12,378 Posts

    The UK wants to essentially ban all secure communications

    In the wake of the recent terror attacks in Paris, the UK Prime Minister David Cameron has called for stronger legislation against secure forms of communication. Encryption wasn't specifically mentioned, instead the Conservative party leader reaffirmed his stance with a question: "Do we want to allow a means of communication between people which, even in extremis, with a signed warrant from the home secretary personally, we cannot read?" Cameron pressed forward with the argument that terrorists are using these protected methods of communication and that the UK government, with fresh legislation in 2016, should be able to monitor them. "Are we going to allow a means of communication where it simply isn't possible to do that? My answer to that is, no, we must not," he said.


    The remarks suggest that Cameron wants to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the UK. If so, the British government could (depending on the detail of the legislation) effectively ban privacy-conscious messaging apps like WhatsApp, iMessage and Snapchat. That is, unless those companies change their services, or provide some sort of backdoor for authorities to read people's conversations. Dropping encryption altogether would, of course, make communications data less secure and lead to companies being more susceptible to cyber attacks. Although the UK is by no means the largest market, it could also discourage developers from developing privacy-focused services. More likely, however, is that it would push developers to move their operations outside of the UK, or simply pull their services in the region -- leaving them unaltered in other markets.


    Any government restrictions on encryption could, in theory, affect other services too, such as secure web browsing and gaming. Even now, the UK has laws in place that require citizens to decrypt their personal data, or hand over decryption keys, should the government request access with a court order. Any refusal carries a two-year penalty, although if the request relates to national security, it can be increased to five.


    The desire to create new legislation could also imply that the UK Prime Minister is keen to resurrect the Draft Communications Data Bill, commonly referred to as the Snooper's Charter. The bill would have required companies to retain basic data about their users' communications, such as the numbers people called and when they called them, for at least 12 months. It didn't include the "content" of the conversations themselves, but the Liberal Democrats have been clear about their ongoing opposition to the bill. Instead, the government (with the backing of all three major parties) rushed in a different piece of legislation called the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act, which emphasizes the metadata that companies need to retain by law. It's a stop-gap measure though -- the bill will be terminated in 2016, which is why Cameron wants to introduce new legislation.


    The Deputy Prime Minister and Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg restated his opposition to the Snooper's Charter today, and, by extension, stood against Cameron's fresh proposals to clamp down on secure communications. Of course, for any of this to happen the Conservative party first needs to win the 2015 general election scheduled for May. Even then, Cameron's proposals will likely face the same level of opposition as the original Snooper's Charter. Effectively banning end-to-end encryption will likely anger a significant portion of the electorate, but the UK Prime Minister will be hoping the recent terror attacks can add weight to the argument that stronger surveillance powers are needed.

    Code:
    http://www.engadget.com/2015/01/13/uk-ban-secure-communications/?ncid=rss_truncated
    My posts contain my own personal thoughts and opinions, they do not represent those of any organisation or group but my own.

    If you don't like what I post, Don't read it.

    SIMPLES.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Larry-G For This Useful Post:

    Sanjhere (16-01-15)

  3. #2

    Title
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    98
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
    Who does he think he's kidding? does he really think that banning secure communications will stop criminals using them? The only people he will be affecting is the average person.
    And if we really want to get technical here under article 8 of the universal declaration of human rights everyone should be treated with "respect for privacy when one has a reasonable expectation of privacy".
    Now I understand these powers would only be used in cases of suspected criminal behaviour, but the key word here is suspected. They will not actually need tangible proof to use them. Another point is that just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean it isn't embarrassing and can be used against someone and GCHQ is not exactly an organisation above using dirty tricks to get what they want.

  4. #3

    Title
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    204
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 46 Times in 40 Posts
    like they will ever achive this, just waisting public cash again! it will be just like they blocked torrent site :-)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.