PDA

View Full Version : CCcam 2.2.3 warning


basilyoung
13-04-11, 21:36
be carefull there is a fake 2.2.3 version out there
this contaians a virus do not use this version

please be aware that this post is not confirmed as true, but be aware
pooface
13-04-11, 21:43
Yeah, I received this warning this morning, and meant to post out ... Just been 1 crap day, lol... Never got around to it...

Thanks for the heads up tho :)
basilyoung
13-04-11, 21:53
Yes, its one of those silly ones, where you think, shall I bother,..but I would rather post an alert, and be wrong, rather than wish I had posted a warning post later
sivhead
14-04-11, 12:10
Its been communicated but noones has really elaborated on what the virus does.... Is it a Pc Virus or a linux virus ? does anyone have any info of what virus it is and what it does or how it came about...

The real question is are there any links to it within this forum ?
Alanp
14-04-11, 12:52
Is there a genuine new 2.2.3 or are all versions of 2.2.3 suspect
Stanman
14-04-11, 19:18
Its been posted on another forum its a PC virus.
dale094
15-04-11, 14:14
its a virus in the Zip file it is very hard to write virus to Unix Os and if its infecting PCs then obviously its not Unix Os virus.
Tw4T
15-04-11, 14:22
Thanks for the heads up :)
Blu-ray
15-04-11, 15:27
Found on another forum that the CCcam 2.2.3 is clean and checked by NoVirusThanks.org and there comments are its fast to fast? what ever that means.
pooface
15-04-11, 15:48
Just do a google search for cccam 2.2.3

All hits are saying it's a fake. There has not been a 2.2.3 version. This version probably contained the binary of a previous version renamed, and included the pc virus... End of...
silverfox0786
15-04-11, 23:33
yeah i agree every where u look its noted as a virus or fake i even got a email waring abbout it

plus what ever happeded to version 2.2.2 we jumped a version lol
basilyoung
15-04-11, 23:45
this warning, as stated, was posted as unproved, and was intended as a "be aware" post

as posted, a linux based virus is highly unlikely, but if its a fake, regardless of the comp virus issue, the simple question is,

why post a fake 2.2.3, rather than 2.2.1??
Stanman
16-04-11, 08:08
Good question Basil, probably because peole more likely to download and try 2.2.3 rather than 2.2.1 as thats been out for a while and is everywhere on the forums but mind you more likley you would dupe some one with a existing cam rather than a new one that people would be wary of and test.
pooface
16-04-11, 09:58
Good question Basil, probably because peole more likely to download and try 2.2.3 rather than 2.2.1 as thats been out for a while and is everywhere on the forums but mind you more likley you would dupe some one with a existing cam rather than a new one that people would be wary of and test.

Plus, why 2.2.3, not 2.2.2 :p
Blu-ray
16-04-11, 15:22
File contains trojan- PSW.Win32.Dybalom.dhd.
basilyoung
16-04-11, 23:25
so what does this trojan do...send info? and to where/who?? ie, softcams are under scrutany, legal rulings recently, is it an attack with a reason? or just some "sh*t that needs a kicking"