Pub landlord suspended for serving 'too full' pints

[Larry-G]

A pub landlord and *landlady have been *suspended from their roles and told they could face the sack for serving 'big' pints of beer.

Brewery bosses are said to have complained that Pete and Debbie Gibson did not serve a big enough head on their pints of beer and lager -- meaning there was more to drink.

As such the firm, Samuel Smith, reportedly claim the pair owe them £10,733 in lost stock and ordered to close their Junction Inn pub at Royton, Greater *Manchester.

The dispute is based around the idea that customers cannot expect more than 95% of their pint glass to be filled with liquid.

What do you think? Should your pint be filled to the top, or are you happy with a 5% foamy head.


http://newslite.tv/2012/01/31/pub-landlord-suspended-for-ser.html

[pooface]

They should have the oversized pint glasses, that way, the liquid goes up to the pint line, and the head goes to the top!

If they don't allow a customer to have their full pint, then they should be sued for mis-selling, as customer expects a pint, and should be getting a pint, not 95% pint and the rest head...